In this episode of Denoised, hosts Addy and Joey unpack three stories creatives should care about: Netflix’s official generative-AI guidelines, a hands-on review of Cosm’s Matrix screening, and a curious use of AI in talent negotiations.
Netflix’s generative-AI guidance: five core principles
Netflix published an internal guide for partners and creators on how to use generative AI in content production. Addy and Joey call it a clear, pragmatic playbook—especially valuable because Netflix has a track record of publishing usable technical guidance (think virtual-production best practices and approved camera lists).
The episode distills Netflix’s guidance into five headline principles and explains the practical stakes for production teams and VFX vendors:
Don’t recreate copyrighted or identifiable material. Outputs should avoid imitating specific characters, copyrighted works or well-known artist styles.
Don’t use production assets to train models. Scripts, dailies or other production inputs should not be fed into external models that might reuse or retain that IP.
Use enterprise-secure environments where possible. Consumer browser tools are convenient, but studios need single-sign-on, monitored IT environments to protect unreleased IP.
Generated material should usually be temporary. Gen‑AI outputs are most appropriate for pre-pro, concept art and previs—not final pixels—unless approved.
Don’t replace talent or union-covered performances without consent. Digital twinning, synthetic voices and re-aging require clear talent agreements and guild involvement.
These principles protect creative rights, production security and union protections while still allowing generative AI to speed ideation and prep where it makes sense. Addy and Joey stress a practical framing: gen‑AI is a tool for getting from point A to B in pre-production or for background elements—not a shortcut to bypass skilled artists on final delivery.
Where Gen AI is a green light (and where it isn’t)
Netflix’s published matrix clarifies which use cases are generally acceptable (storyboards, previs, background assets) and which require approval (featured characters, props, or any use that replicates living performers or copyrighted source material). This graded approach reduces ambiguity: many day-to-day uses are fine; headline or hero elements need sign-off.
That nuance matters for producers choosing between free, browser-based tools and enterprise solutions. The hosts recommend treating model behavior and data handling as a procurement decision—ask vendors point-blank how they handle inputs, storage and training.
Ethics and archival work: a documentary caution
One less-discussed but crucial part of Netflix’s guidance: don’t create generative elements that could be mistaken for real events. For documentary makers and archival projects, the line between “generated background” and “fabricated evidence” can have real reputational consequences.
Example: a brief generated historical document in the background is probably incidental. A forged broadcast clip or fabricated statement presented as archival is not. The hosts argue that productions must label or otherwise distinguish generated content, especially when working with contemporary or sensitive subjects.
Cosm: the Matrix Experience. What Worked. What Didn't
Addy and Joey attended Cosm’s Matrix experience to test the format: an unaltered film playing in a large curved LED dome with immersive, scene-driven periphery visuals and haptic feedback. Their verdict: the concept delivers tremendous novelty, but execution matters.
Highlights:
Immersion: The surround environments that extend the film’s scenes created memorable moments—examples include the vertigo-inducing office sequence and the ripple effect when a helicopter strikes the building. Sync between the film and the Unreal-built environments was tight and emotionally effective.
Sports promise: The venue excels at live-event feeds and proprietary camera angles. The sports demo reels looked like the best use case for the dome.
Haptics and cues: Seat rumblers and timed environmental lighting added tactile impact during explosions and gunfire.
The projection problem
The major technical gripe was the movie file itself. The Matrix footage looked lossy—blocky in places, jittery frame cadence and limited contrast compared to the native dome assets. The hosts propose the likely causes:
Source codec/gamut mismatch (Rec.709 vs Rec.2020) and color-space conversion artifacts.
Frame rate processing: many LED processors are optimized for broadcast formats (59.94) rather than native 24 fps cinema, which can introduce judder.
Licensing constraints: Exhibitors may not be allowed to alter a licensed master, limiting upscaling or frame‑rate conversion options.
Matrix-themed food and value takeaways
Cosm’s themed dining added theatricality—timed noodle boxes, a steak bite during a Cipher scene and a cookie when the Oracle appears. It was clever staging, but the hosts felt the prix-fixe add-on under-delivered for price. For future visits they’d skip the expensive themed plate and order from the regular menu (pizza looked good and reasonably priced).
AI as leverage in talent negotiations—how real is the data?
A Variety piece reported that talent reps used AI tools to analyze audience sentiment and argue for higher compensation—claiming the actress drove viewership on Amazon’s new film. Addy and Joey dig into what’s plausible and what’s not.
The short take: sentiment analytics are real, but raw LLMs like ChatGPT or consumer apps are not turnkey replacements for rigorous audience analytics. Accurate measurement requires data pipelines, social‑listening platforms and specialist analytics vendors (e.g., Brandwatch, Meltwater, MoJo-style box-office analytics). LLMs can summarize, but they can also hallucinate—so their outputs alone are weak evidence in negotiations.
If agencies want reproducible insights, the recommended path is clear: either license enterprise analytics or build custom models with platform partners (OpenAI, etc.) and legally auditable data sources. That gives reps defensible metrics they can bring to studios.
Conclusion: practical guidance for creators
The episode stitches three themes together: small audience rituals reveal viewer habits; studios need clear, pragmatic rules for adopting generative AI; and new formats (like dome cinemas) can deliver novel emotional experiences—but technical fidelity matters.
For filmmakers and production teams, the immediate takeaways are:
Treat generative AI as a production tool, not a black box: define inputs, security and final‑pixel responsibilities before you use it.
Prefer enterprise-grade tools for sensitive IP and insist on clear vendor contracts about data usage and training.
When programming immersive venues, confirm the source master quality and ask how distributors handle color space and frame-rate conversion.
If using AI analytics for business negotiations, rely on auditable data sources and specialist analytics rather than chat-based summaries alone.
Addy and Joey conclude that cautious optimism is the right posture: use new tools to expand creative options, but keep legal, technical and ethical guardrails in place. For producers, VFX leads and studio execs, that pragmatic balance is the operational headline to act on today.
